Expert Analysis: Joshua, Charlton vs. Jones, Scott

The upcoming match between Joshua, Charlton and Jones, Scott on September 10, 2025, presents intriguing betting opportunities. Both players bring unique strengths to the court, with Charlton known for his aggressive baseline play and Jones for his exceptional net skills. Given their past performances and current form, this match is expected to be highly competitive. The data suggests several betting angles worth considering.

Betting Predictions

Over 1st Set Games: 77.30

With a probability of 77.30%, the expectation is that the first set will feature more than the average number of games. This could be due to both players’ tendencies to engage in longer rallies and their strategic depth, which often results in extended sets.

Under 2.5 Sets: 79.50

At 79.50%, the odds favor the match concluding in fewer than 2.5 sets. This suggests a strong likelihood of either player securing a decisive victory early on, possibly due to one player’s ability to break the opponent’s serve consistently.

Tie Break in 1st Set (No): 75.90

With a 75.90% chance, it is predicted that the first set will not go to a tie break. This indicates that one player might dominate early in the set, potentially breaking serve multiple times and avoiding a closely contested tie break scenario.

Under 1st Set Games: 64.10

The probability of 64.10% suggests that the first set may end with fewer than the average number of games. This could occur if one player establishes an early lead and maintains it throughout the set.

Tie Break in Match (No): 53.40

At 53.40%, there is a slight edge towards not having any tie breaks throughout the entire match. This implies that one player might have a significant advantage during critical points, allowing them to avoid tie breaks altogether.

Total Games 2-Way (Over 22.5): 50.50

With an even chance of 50.50%, this bet hinges on whether the total number of games played will exceed or fall short of 22.5. Given the competitive nature of both players, this outcome remains uncertain, reflecting the potential for either a quick conclusion or a drawn-out contest.