Home » Tennis » Pereira, Tiago vs Paulson,Andrew

Pereira, Tiago vs Paulson,Andrew

Expert Opinion on Pereira vs. Paulson Tennis Match

The upcoming match between Tiago Pereira and Andrew Paulson on September 9, 2025, promises to be an engaging encounter. With Pereira’s consistent performance on clay courts and Paulson’s recent form improvement, the match is expected to be competitive. Pereira’s baseline game and endurance might give him an edge, while Paulson’s aggressive play could disrupt Pereira’s rhythm. The betting odds reflect these dynamics, with a strong likelihood of the match not going to a tie break in the first set or the entire match.

Pereira, Tiago

LLLLL
-

Paulson,Andrew

LWWWW
Date: 2025-09-09
Time: 13:05
(FT)
Venue: Szczecin - Court 1

Predictions:

MarketPredictionOddResult
Over 1st Set Games58.50%(1-0) 7-6 1st Set 1.83
Under 1st Set Games65.90%(1-0) 7-6 1st Set 1.29
Tie Break in 1st Set (No)96.90%(1-0)
Tie Break in Match (No)73.00%(1-0)
Under 2.5 Sets68.40%(1-0)
Total Games 2-Way (Over 22.5)50.60%(1-0) 1.91
Total Games 3-Way (Under 22)52.50%(1-0)

Betting Predictions

First Set Games

  • Over 1st Set Games: 56.80% – Given Pereira’s tactical play and ability to extend rallies, the first set is likely to see more games than expected.
  • Under 1st Set Games: 64.90% – Despite Pereira’s skills, Paulson’s recent form suggests a tighter set with fewer games.

Tie Break Predictions

  • Tie Break in 1st Set (No): 93.20% – The high probability indicates that one player will likely secure a clear advantage early in the set.
  • Tie Break in Match (No): 69.40% – Both players’ strengths suggest they can avoid tie breaks by capitalizing on crucial points.

Set and Game Predictions

  • Under 2.5 Sets: 70.90% – The match is anticipated to be decided in straight sets, given both players’ current form and stamina.
  • Total Games 2-Way (Over 22.5): 51.90% – The likelihood of a high total game count reflects potential extended rallies and competitive exchanges.
  • Total Games 3-Way (Under 22): 49.90% – Conversely, efficient play from either player could result in fewer games.